SAVE Act Warning Issued: ‘Amounts to a Poll Tax’

The SAVE Act: Understanding the Debate Over Voter Registration Requirements

Introduction to the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act, introduced by Representative Chip Roy, proposes a significant change to voter registration by requiring individuals to provide paper proof of citizenship. This proof could include documents such as a birth certificate, REAL ID, passport, or other verified government documents. While the intent is to ensure voting integrity, critics argue that this requirement could impose financial burdens on certain groups, effectively functioning like a poll tax.

Criticism and Historical Context

Critics, including Genesis Robinson of the Equal Ground Action Fund, compare the SAVE Act to historical poll taxes that disproportionately affected Black and low-income voters. Robinson highlights that the financial burden of obtaining necessary documents could disenfranchise marginalized communities, stating, "It basically amounts to a poll tax." This comparison underscores the concern that the act may erect unnecessary barriers to voting, a fundamental right.

Background and Rationale of the SAVE Act

The SAVE Act was introduced in 2024 and again in 2025, with proponents arguing it prevents noncitizen voting. However, studies show that noncitizen voting is rare, with Georgia’s audit finding only 20 noncitizens out of 8.4 million registered voters. Despite this, Representative Roy maintains the act is necessary, though opponents counter that it addresses a minimal issue with significant collateral consequences.

Practical Challenges in Obtaining Documents

The act’s requirement poses practical challenges, particularly for those who cannot easily obtain documents. Approximately 21.3 million people lack ready access to citizenship documents, with 146 million without passports and 69 million married women whose names may not match their birth certificates. This disproportionately affects older Black Americans who may not have birth certificates due to historical segregation, forcing them to incur costs for alternative documents.

Implications for Voter Rolls and Eligibility

The SAVE Act could lead to voter roll purges, potentially removing eligible citizens and forcing them to re-register. This process could disenfranchise many, as past purges have inadvertently targeted citizens. The act’s lack of funding for states to implement new registration mechanisms further complicates the issue, raising concerns about rural and under-resourced areas.

Current Status and Ongoing Debate

Despite its introduction, the SAVE Act has not yet passed, with a Democratic Senate previously blocking it. Now, with a Republican majority, its passage seems more likely. Advocates like Jonathan Diaz warn of significant barriers to registration, particularly affecting rural areas. Representative Roy counters that the act is popular and necessary, but critics emphasize the need to protect voting rights. As the debate continues, the focus remains on balancing election integrity with equal access to the ballot.