‘Remove them from our land’: Prabowo plans to build remote island prison for Indonesia’s corruption convicts

A Stern Warning: Island Prisons for the Corrupt

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has taken a bold stance in his crusade against corruption, unveiling a controversial plan to isolate those convicted of such crimes on a remote island prison. During a visit to the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education in Jakarta on March 13, Prabowo emphasized the severity of corruption’s impact on the nation and its citizens. He vowed to “remove them from our land” and even suggested allocating a special budget to construct a prison in a remote area, where escape would be nearly impossible. In a dramatic flourish, he mentioned the possibility of selecting an island where would-be escapees would have to contend with sharks. This proposal reflects the president’s determination to crack down on corruption, which he believes has long hindered Indonesia’s development.

The Broader Impact of Corruption on Society

Prabowo’s announcement was not just a threat; it was a scathing critique of how corruption has deprived Indonesian citizens of resources meant for public welfare. Speaking to the press, he highlighted the detrimental effects of corrupt practices on society, particularly on vulnerable groups such as teachers, doctors, medical workers, and farmers. These individuals, he argued, have borne the brunt of the unethical misappropriation of state funds, which has undermined the country’s progress. Prabowo’s remarks underscored his vision for a clean government, free from corruption, and his commitment to utilizing Indonesia’s vast resources and wealth to reduce financial leaks and graft.

A Leader’s Determination to Fight Corruption

Prabowo’s tough rhetoric on corruption is not new. In December, he called on judges to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of graft, suggesting that offenders responsible for massive state losses should face decades behind bars. His recent remarks, however, take this a step further by proposing the creation of a remote prison facility. The president’s unwavering resolve to tackle corruption is evident in his statement: “They must understand that I am ready to die for this nation and country. I am not afraid of any mafia.” This bold declaration reflects his determination to root out corruption, regardless of the challenges or opposition he may face.

A History of High-Profile Corruption Cases in Indonesia

Prabowo’s announcement comes amid a string of high-profile corruption scandals that have rocked Indonesia in recent years. Last year, prominent businessman Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison and fined $13 million for his role in a large-scale tin-mining corruption case. More recently, top executives from subsidiaries of Pertamina, Indonesia’s state-owned oil and gas company, were arrested in connection with a $12 billion crude oil corruption scandal. These cases highlight the pervasive nature of corruption in the country and the need for stronger measures to address it.

Public Reaction and the Road Ahead

While Prabowo’s proposal for an island prison has garnered significant attention, it has also sparked debate. Critics have raised concerns about the practicality and human rights implications of such a plan, while supporters applaud the president’s firm stance on corruption. For many Indonesians, the fight against corruption is a matter of urgency, as the misallocation of public funds has led to inadequate infrastructure, insufficient healthcare, and poor education systems. Prabowo’s tough rhetoric resonates with those who feel that previous governments have failed to adequately address the issue. However, the success of his anti-corruption campaign will depend on his ability to implement these plans effectively and ensure that justice is served without compromising human rights or the rule of law.

Conclusion: A Nation’s Quest for Integrity

President Prabowo Subianto’s proposal to establish a remote island prison for corrupt officials is a symbolic gesture of his commitment to eradicating graft in Indonesia. While the idea may seem extreme, it reflects the depth of frustration among citizens who have long suffered the consequences of corruption. As Indonesia continues its fight against corruption, the focus must remain on creating a fair and transparent justice system that holds offenders accountable while protecting the rights of all individuals. The president’s determination to lead this charge is a promising sign, but the real test lies in translating his rhetoric into tangible results that benefit the nation and its people.