Connect with us

Politics

Trump revokes Secret Service protection for adult Biden children Hunter and Ashley

Published

on

Hunter Biden Delaware Trial Day 3 34

President Trump Announces End to Secret Service Protection for Biden’s Adult Children

In a recent announcement made on his Truth Social platform, President Donald Trump revealed that the adult children of former President Joe Biden will no longer receive protection from the U.S. Secret Service. This decision affects both Hunter Biden and his sister, Ashley Biden. Trump expressed his dissatisfaction with the extent of the protection, stating that Hunter Biden has been under Secret Service protection for a prolonged period, and criticized the size of the detail assigned to him, which he claims includes up to 18 agents. He also mentioned that Ashley Biden has had 13 agents dedicated to her security. The President emphasized that the protection for both individuals will be terminated immediately.

The Secret Service Responds to the Change

The Secret Service has confirmed President Trump’s decision and has stated that they are in the process of complying with the new directive. They are working closely with the protective details and the White House to ensure a smooth transition as the protection is withdrawn. While the Secret Service did not provide further details, it is understood that they will adhere to the President’s orders. Meanwhile, attempts were made to reach out to Hunter Biden’s legal team for a response, but no statement has been forthcoming as of yet.

Understanding the Scope of Secret Service Protection

Under federal law, former presidents and their spouses are entitled to lifelong Secret Service protection. However, this protection does not automatically extend to their immediate family members beyond the age of 16 once they leave office. Both Presidents Trump and Biden, however, chose to extend protection for their children for an additional six months after their respective terms ended. This courtesy, however, appears to have come to an end with President Trump’s recent announcement.

Context of the Decision

President Trump’s announcement comes at a time when he has been vocal about his disapproval of the Biden administration’s policies and actions. In his Truth Social post, Trump also criticized former President Biden’s current activities, mentioning that Biden is vacationing in South Africa. The President expressed concerns over South Africa’s land exploration laws, which he claims allow the government to seize land without compensation, disproportionately affecting White landowners. Additionally, Trump highlighted South Africa’s support for groups designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S., such as Hamas and Iran, as reasons for ending economic and financial assistance to the country.

Diplomatic Tensions with South Africa Intensify

The strained relationship between the Trump administration and South Africa has been further exacerbated by recent remarks made by South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool. In a public webinar, Rasool criticized the Trump administration’s policies on diversity, equity, and immigration, drawing a link to what he described as a “supremacist assault” reflected in the MAGA movement. Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded swiftly, labeling Rasool as a “race-baiting politician” who harbors animosity towards Trump. Rubio also declared Rasool persona non grata, signaling that the ambassador is no longer welcome in the United States.

Implications and Reactions

The decision to revoke Secret Service protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden, coupled with the escalating tensions with South Africa, reflects the broader political climate under the Trump administration. The move has sparked debates about the appropriate use of executive power and the boundaries of security protections for public figures. While supporters of the decision argue that it aligns with legal guidelines and fiscal responsibility, critics view it as a politically motivated action. As the situation unfolds, attention will be focused on how these changes impact the individuals involved and the broader implications for U.S. foreign relations.

Advertisement

Trending