‘They/Them/Turtle’: Oregon mental health advisory board includes member who identifies as terrapin species

Oregon’s Consumer Advisory Council: A Blend of Diversity and Advocacy

The Oregon Consumer Advisory Council (OCAC), part of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), plays a pivotal role in shaping the state’s mental health policies. Comprising members who have lived experiences with mental health challenges, the council is appointed by OHA Director Dr. Sejal Hathi, who was appointed by Governor Tina Kotek. Each member serves a two-year term, with the possibility of re-election, ensuring a dynamic and evolving advisory body.

JD Holt, a council member, identifies as "turtlegender," a non-binary gender identity linked to a connection with turtles, as noted on platforms like Gender Wiki. Holt’s presence on the council reflects the diversity that OCAC aims to represent, emphasizing the importance of varied perspectives in policy-making. The council’s role extends to investigating, evaluating, and recommending improvements in mental health services, supported by an annual working plan with specific goals.

JD Holt’s Activism and Its Implications

Holt’s personal activism, including anarchist causes and opposition to immigration enforcement, has drawn attention. While Holt’s mental health advocacy is integral to OCAC’s work, questions arise about the intersection of personal beliefs and public service roles. The OHA values diverse perspectives, suggesting that Holt’s activism is seen as a strength in representing the community, though it may also spark discussions on potential biases in policy recommendations.

Council Operations and Funding

OCAC’s operations are grounded in lived experience, with members selected through a collaborative process involving existing council members and the director. Their annual plans and recommendations aim to enhance mental health resources, reflecting a commitment to community-driven policies. While the OHA’s budget is substantial at $35.8 billion, the exact allocation to OCAC remains undisclosed, hinting at a modest role within the broader funds.

Broader Implications and Responses

The council’s diversity aligns with Oregon’s progressive values, fostering inclusive policy-making. However, it also raises questions about representation and accountability. The absence of responses from Holt, Hathi, and Kotek suggests a reticence that may stem from media scrutiny or busyness, leaving the narrative open to interpretation.

In conclusion, the OCAC exemplifies Oregon’s commitment to diverse and community-focused mental health policies. JD Holt’s story underscores the complexities of balancing personal advocacy with public service, highlighting the council’s potential to evolve and influence future policies effectively.