The Unusual Absence of Zhao Leji from China’s Top Legislative Meeting

Introduction: The Man and His Role

Zhao Leji, a prominent figure in China’s political landscape, recently made headlines for his unexpected absence from the closing ceremony of the National People’s Congress (NPC). As the third-highest-ranking official in the Communist Party of China and the chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, Zhao’s presence is typically a given at such significant events. His absence not only raised eyebrows but also sparked widespread speculation among political observers and the general public alike. This article delves into the details of his absence, its historical context, and the potential implications for China’s political culture.

Zhao Leji’s Absence: A Break from Tradition

Zhao Leji’s absence from the NPC closing meeting on March 11 marked a departure from decades of political tradition. Historically, all members of the Politburo Standing Committee, the top decision-making body in China, have attended both the opening and closing ceremonies of the NPC and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). Known collectively as the "Two Sessions," these meetings are pivotal for setting the legislative and political agenda for the year. Zhao’s absence, therefore, was not just a personal matter but a notable deviation from established norms.

Historical Context: The Significance of the Two Sessions

The Two Sessions have been a cornerstone of China’s political calendar since the 1980s. They serve as a platform for the country’s elite to gather, discuss pressing issues, and showcase unity. For the leadership, attending these sessions is not just a formality but a demonstration of commitment to the political process and a sign of solidarity. Zhao’s absence, therefore, was not just a personal matter but also a potential signal of broader political dynamics at play.

Li Hongzhong Steps In: Continuity and Communication

In Zhao’s absence, Deputy NPC chief Li Hongzhong took the reins, presiding over the closing ceremony. Li announced that Zhao had requested leave due to a respiratory tract infection, a plausible explanation given the current global health climate. However, the announcement also underscored the importance of maintaining continuity in political processes. Li’s role in stepping in ensured that the proceedings unfolded smoothly, reinforcing the resilience of China’s political institutions.

Implications of Zhao’s Absence

While Zhao’s absence was attributed to health reasons, it inevitably led to speculation about the broader political landscape. In China’s tightly choreographed political environment, such absences are rare and often scrutinized for hidden meanings. The fact that Zhao missed both the NPC and CPPCC closing ceremonies, events typically attended by all top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, added to the intrigue. This incident highlights the delicate balance of power and the meticulous image management that characterize China’s political leadership.

Conclusion: Health, Politics, and the Human Factor

Zhao Leji’s absence from the NPC closing meeting offers a rare glimpse into the human side of China’s political elite, who, despite their elevated status, are not immune to health issues. While the incident may have raised eyebrows, it also underscores the resilience of China’s political system, where other leaders can step in to maintain continuity. As the country continues to navigate complex domestic and international challenges, episodes like this remind us of the interplay between individual health, political protocol, and the broader dynamics of leadership.

In summary, Zhao Leji’s absence from the NPC closing meeting, while a departure from tradition, also serves as a reminder of the human element in even the most structured political systems. As China moves forward, such incidents will undoubtedly be scrutinized for deeper meanings, reflecting both the strengths and vulnerabilities of its leadership.