Wisconsin Governor Defends Push To Redefine ‘Mother’ as ‘Inseminated Person’

Governor Tony Evers’ Proposal for Gender-Neutral Language in Wisconsin

Introduction

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers has sparked significant attention with his proposal to adopt gender-neutral language in state law, particularly substituting "mother" with "inseminated person." This change is part of a broader effort to modernize legal terminology, reflecting a diverse society. Evers’ initiative, included in the 2025-2027 state budget, aims to ensure legal clarity and inclusivity, especially for those undergoing IVF. Despite its progressive intent, the proposal has drawn fierce criticism, highlighting the polarized political landscape.

The Budget Proposal

Evers’ budget includes a section advocating for gender-neutral terms, replacing "mother" and "father" with "person" and "spouse." Specifically, in IVF contexts, "mother" would become "inseminated person." This change aims to provide legal certainty for all individuals, regardless of gender identity, ensuring they receive necessary care without discrimination. The proposal is part of a broader strategy to make state laws more inclusive, aligning Wisconsin with evolving societal norms.

The Backlash

The proposal has met with strong opposition from Republicans, who view it as unnecessary and ideologically driven. Critics argue that such changes undermine traditional family roles, with State Representative Amanda Stuck criticizing the redefinition of motherhood. Public figures like Elon Musk have also mocked the proposal, reflecting broader resistance to gender-neutral language in conservative circles.

Governor Evers’ Defense

Evers has vigorously defended his proposal, emphasizing its intent to provide legal certainty for those using IVF. He accuses Republicans of politicizing the issue, asserting that the change maintains traditional family roles while expanding inclusivity. Evers underlined the importance of ensuring all individuals, including LGBTQ+ families, have legal protections, challenging critics to focus on the proposal’s practical benefits.

Broader National Context

Evers’ proposal aligns with national debates on DEI and LGBTQ+ rights, occurring amidst the Trump administration’s rollback of related policies. The administration has targeted transgender rights, including sports participation and military service, reflecting a broader conservative push against gender-neutral language. This clash highlights the complexities of balancing legal clarity with societal values, underscoring the need for inclusive policies.

Conclusion

The proposal’s fate remains uncertain as it moves through the state Senate, with potential implications beyond Wisconsin. The debate reflects a national struggle over inclusivity and traditional values, emphasizing the challenges of creating laws that serve diverse populations. As Evers and opponents await the legislative outcome, the proposal stands as a symbol of broader tensions in American society.